After years of using your pool, your pool’s attractiveness will likely deteriorate due to wearing out of plaster. So, you might consider other pool finish alternatives. Some pool owners tend to consider painting their pools instead of replastering. Well, pool painting is quite affordable, and pool owners have used this technique for many years. So, should you paint or replaster your pool?
Reasons why you should paint or replaster your pool? #
Although pool paint incurs lower initial costs, it does not offer high durability compared to plaster. Pool paint starts wearing out after three to five years. On the flip side, high-quality plaster lasts up to two decades. Thus, with plaster, you won’t have to replace it as often as possible. Replastering your pool will therefore be a good alternative if you compare longevity aspects.
Level of aesthetics #
Typically, both pool paint and plaster offer excellent aesthetics. However, pool plaster is likely to retain its appealing nature for a more extended period. But it depends on the color of the plaster. If you have a bright-colored plaster, it is more likely to develop discolorations within a short period. Pool paint is equally beautiful. But, unlike plaster, the attractiveness will start diminishing after two years. When it comes to aesthetics, plaster wins.
When you are contemplating whether to paint or replaster a pool, consider the costs. If you have a tight budget, you would instead settle with pool paint. Replastering a pool can cost you thousands of dollars. Of course, the price increases depending on the plaster’s quality and the size of the pool. On average, pool owners end up spending about $4,000 to replaster their pool. On the flip side, you can spend as little as $1,000 when painting your pool. However, don’t be quick in overlooking plaster due to its high cost. Pool paint is expensive in the long run. I mean, you will have to replace it after every three to five years. So, even if you spend $5,000 on replastering a pool, you won’t have to conduct this process again for at least ten years. So, when it comes to short term costs, pool paint wins. But when you analyze the long-term costs of both equipment, plaster is the best alternative.
If you face a dilemma of whether to paint or replaster your pool, look at your pool needs and budget. Then, decide on the method that caters to all your pool needs. But it would be best if you understood both the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Note that plaster incurs high initial costs and offers long term benefits. On the other hand, pool paint is relatively affordable but wears out pretty quickly.
You must be logged in to post a comment.